Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Bellflower
This post compares San Bruno, California to Bellflower, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Bellflower (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 77,852 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $40,092 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $398,000 |
| White | 49% | 32% |
| Black | 1% | 13% |
| Asian | 28% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Bellflower?
A: San Bruno has a smaller population count than Bellflower: 43105 compared with 77852 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Bellflower?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Bellflower?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 60% for Bellflower.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z