Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Bruno to Ashland
This post compares San Bruno, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Bruno (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,105 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $61,645 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $754,700 | $396,400 |
| White | 49% | 44% |
| Black | 1% | 17% |
| Asian | 28% | 20% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Bruno or Ashland?
A: San Bruno has a larger population count than Ashland: 43105 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Bruno or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Bruno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Bruno or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Bruno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for San Bruno versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Bruno may include: Torrance, San-Mateo, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z