Compare-Cities.com
Compare Salinas to South El Monte
This post compares Salinas, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Salinas (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 156,811 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $36,201 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $342,100 | $389,400 |
| White | 56% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 14% |
| With Kids | 50% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 55% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Salinas or South El Monte?
A: Salinas has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 156811 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Salinas or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Salinas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Salinas or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Salinas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Salinas does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Salinas versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Salinas may include: South-Gate, Watsonville, and Atwater.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z