Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sacramento to South San Francisco
This post compares Sacramento, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sacramento (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 489,650 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $46,110 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $287,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 48% | 33% |
| Black | 13% | 2% |
| Asian | 18% | 39% |
| With Kids | 31% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 52% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sacramento or South San Francisco?
A: Sacramento has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 489650 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sacramento or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sacramento.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sacramento or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sacramento.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sacramento does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Sacramento versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sacramento may include: Long-Beach, Stockton, and Fresno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z