Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sacramento to Belmont
This post compares Sacramento, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sacramento (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 489,650 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $46,110 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $287,600 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 48% | 62% |
| Black | 13% | 1% |
| Asian | 18% | 27% |
| With Kids | 31% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 52% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sacramento or Belmont?
A: Sacramento has a much larger population count than Belmont: 489650 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sacramento or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sacramento.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sacramento or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sacramento.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sacramento does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Sacramento versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sacramento may include: Long-Beach, Stockton, and Fresno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z