Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sacramento to Ashland
This post compares Sacramento, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sacramento (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 489,650 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $46,110 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $287,600 | $396,400 |
| White | 48% | 44% |
| Black | 13% | 17% |
| Asian | 18% | 20% |
| With Kids | 31% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 52% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sacramento or Ashland?
A: Sacramento has a much larger population count than Ashland: 489650 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sacramento or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Sacramento.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sacramento or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Sacramento.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 52% for Sacramento versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sacramento may include: Long-Beach, Stockton, and Fresno.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z