Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $322,800 |
| White | 24% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 61% | 10% |
| With Kids | 32% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 34% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or South San Jose Hills?
A: Rowland Heights has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 50572 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rowland Heights does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z