Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to San Bruno
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 24% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 61% | 28% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 34% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or San Bruno?
A: Rowland Heights has a similar population count than San Bruno: 50572 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z