Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to Foster City
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 24% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 61% | 47% |
| With Kids | 32% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
| Rentals | 34% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or Foster City?
A: Rowland Heights has a larger population count than Foster City: 50572 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z