Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to Foothill Farms
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $201,200 |
| White | 24% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 61% | 5% |
| With Kids | 32% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 34% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or Foothill Farms?
A: Rowland Heights has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 50572 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z