Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to Fairfield
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $341,500 |
| White | 24% | 46% |
| Black | 1% | 14% |
| Asian | 61% | 17% |
| With Kids | 32% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 34 |
| Rentals | 34% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or Fairfield?
A: Rowland Heights has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 50572 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z