Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rowland Heights to Beverly Hills
This post compares Rowland Heights, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rowland Heights (CDP) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,572 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $42,165 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $594,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 24% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 61% | 9% |
| With Kids | 32% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 34% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rowland Heights or Beverly Hills?
A: Rowland Heights has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 50572 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rowland Heights or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rowland Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rowland Heights or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rowland Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Rowland Heights versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rowland Heights may include: Temple-City, Daly-City, and Monterey-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z