Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Roseville, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 78% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 10% |
| With Kids | 35% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or South San Jose Hills?
A: Roseville has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 130705 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Roseville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z