Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to South San Francisco
This post compares Roseville, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 39% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or South San Francisco?
A: Roseville has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 130705 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Roseville versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z