Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to South Pasadena
This post compares Roseville, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $928,500 |
| White | 78% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 9% | 29% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or South Pasadena?
A: Roseville has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 130705 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z