Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to San Francisco
This post compares Roseville, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Roseville (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 130,705 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $64,526 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $927,400 |
White | 78% | 47% |
Black | 1% | 5% |
Asian | 9% | 34% |
With Kids | 35% | 18% |
Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
Rentals | 35% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or San Francisco?
A: Roseville has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 130705 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z