Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to San Bruno
This post compares Roseville, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $754,700 |
| White | 78% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 28% |
| With Kids | 35% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or San Bruno?
A: Roseville has a larger population count than San Bruno: 130705 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z