Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to Redlands
This post compares Roseville, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $350,900 |
| White | 78% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 9% | 7% |
| With Kids | 35% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or Redlands?
A: Roseville has a larger population count than Redlands: 130705 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z