Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to Foster City
This post compares Roseville, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 78% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 47% |
| With Kids | 35% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or Foster City?
A: Roseville has a larger population count than Foster City: 130705 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z