Compare-Cities.com
Compare Roseville to Foothill Farms
This post compares Roseville, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Roseville (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,705 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $64,526 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $386,300 | $201,200 |
| White | 78% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 9% | 5% |
| With Kids | 35% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 33 |
| Rentals | 35% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Roseville or Foothill Farms?
A: Roseville has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 130705 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Roseville or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Roseville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Roseville or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Roseville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Roseville versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Roseville may include: Rocklin, Santee, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z