Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Yucca Valley
This post compares Riverside, California to Yucca Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Yucca Valley (town) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 21,483 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $47,320 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $160,500 |
| White | 61% | 80% |
| Black | 6% | 6% |
| Asian | 7% | 1% |
| With Kids | 40% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 42 |
| Rentals | 45% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Yucca Valley?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Yucca Valley: 321570 compared with 21483 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Yucca Valley?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Yucca Valley?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 37% for Yucca Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z