Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Watsonville
This post compares Riverside, California to Watsonville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Watsonville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 53,452 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $31,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $397,900 |
| White | 61% | 55% |
| Black | 6% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 40% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 29 |
| Rentals | 45% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Watsonville?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Watsonville: 321570 compared with 53452 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Watsonville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Watsonville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 58% for Watsonville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z