Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Union City
This post compares Riverside, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $620,200 |
| White | 61% | 21% |
| Black | 6% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 53% |
| With Kids | 40% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Union City?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Union City: 321570 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z