Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Riverside, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 61% | 36% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 10% |
| With Kids | 40% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or South San Jose Hills?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 321570 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z