Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to South San Francisco
This post compares Riverside, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 61% | 33% |
| Black | 6% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 39% |
| With Kids | 40% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or South San Francisco?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 321570 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z