Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Selma
This post compares Riverside, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $171,200 |
| White | 61% | 78% |
| Black | 6% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 30 |
| Rentals | 45% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Selma?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Selma: 321570 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Riverside versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z