Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to San Bruno
This post compares Riverside, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $754,700 |
| White | 61% | 49% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 40% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or San Bruno?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 321570 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Riverside versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z