Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Riverside, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 61% | 62% |
| Black | 6% | 9% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 40% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Riverside has a larger population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 321570 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z