Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to North Highlands
This post compares Riverside, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | North Highlands (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 47,357 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $35,489 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $168,300 |
| White | 61% | 65% |
| Black | 6% | 13% |
| Asian | 7% | 6% |
| With Kids | 40% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 31 |
| Rentals | 45% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or North Highlands?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than North Highlands: 321570 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z