Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Madera
This post compares Riverside, California to Madera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Riverside (city) | Madera (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 321,570 | 64,058 |
Income (median) | $41,576 | $34,672 |
Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $180,400 |
White | 61% | 72% |
Black | 6% | 3% |
Asian | 7% | 1% |
With Kids | 40% | 54% |
Age (median) | 31 | 28 |
Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Madera?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Madera: 321570 compared with 64058 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Madera?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Madera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Madera does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 54% for Madera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z