Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Chino Hills
This post compares Riverside, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $567,200 |
| White | 61% | 46% |
| Black | 6% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 33% |
| With Kids | 40% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Chino Hills?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Chino Hills: 321570 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z