Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Bell Gardens
This post compares Riverside, California to Bell Gardens, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Bell Gardens (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 42,845 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $25,604 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $347,300 |
| White | 61% | 79% |
| Black | 6% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 0% |
| With Kids | 40% | 61% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 28 |
| Rentals | 45% | 77% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Bell Gardens?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Bell Gardens: 321570 compared with 42845 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Bell Gardens?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Bell Gardens?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell Gardens does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 77% for Bell Gardens.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z