Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverside to Ashland
This post compares Riverside, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverside (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 321,570 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $41,576 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $319,200 | $396,400 |
| White | 61% | 44% |
| Black | 6% | 17% |
| Asian | 7% | 20% |
| With Kids | 40% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverside or Ashland?
A: Riverside has a much larger population count than Ashland: 321570 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverside or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverside.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverside or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverside.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Riverside versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverside may include: Bakersfield, Pomona, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z