Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Yucca Valley
This post compares Riverbank, California to Yucca Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Yucca Valley (town) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 21,483 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $47,320 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $160,500 |
| White | 79% | 80% |
| Black | 0% | 6% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 46% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 42 |
| Rentals | 32% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Yucca Valley?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Yucca Valley: 24047 compared with 21483 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Yucca Valley?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Yucca Valley?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Yucca Valley does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 37% for Yucca Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z