Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Woodland
This post compares Riverbank, California to Woodland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Woodland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 58,324 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $45,325 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $316,500 |
| White | 79% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 32% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Woodland?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Woodland: 24047 compared with 58324 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Woodland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Woodland?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Woodland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 44% for Woodland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z