Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Watsonville
This post compares Riverbank, California to Watsonville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Watsonville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 53,452 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $31,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $397,900 |
| White | 79% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 46% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 32% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Watsonville?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Watsonville: 24047 compared with 53452 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Watsonville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Watsonville?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 58% for Watsonville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z