Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Walnut Creek
This post compares Riverbank, California to Walnut Creek, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Walnut Creek (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 68,516 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $84,028 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $704,900 |
| White | 79% | 76% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 46% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 48 |
| Rentals | 32% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Walnut Creek?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Walnut Creek: 24047 compared with 68516 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Walnut Creek?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Walnut Creek?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walnut Creek does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 36% for Walnut Creek.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z