Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Vista
This post compares Riverbank, California to Vista, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Vista (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 99,496 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $36,614 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $423,500 |
| White | 79% | 80% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 32% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Vista?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Vista: 24047 compared with 99496 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Vista?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Vista?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Vista does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 50% for Vista.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z