Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Union City
This post compares Riverbank, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $620,200 |
| White | 79% | 21% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 53% |
| With Kids | 46% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 32% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Union City?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Union City: 24047 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Union City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z