Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Riverbank, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 79% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 46% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 32% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or South San Jose Hills?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 24047 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z