Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to South Pasadena
This post compares Riverbank, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 79% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 46% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or South Pasadena?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 24047 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z