Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Riverbank, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 79% | 81% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 46% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 32% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 24047 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z