Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to South El Monte
This post compares Riverbank, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $389,400 |
| White | 79% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 46% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 32% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or South El Monte?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than South El Monte: 24047 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z