Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Selma
This post compares Riverbank, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $171,200 |
| White | 79% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Selma?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Selma: 24047 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z