Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Santa Monica
This post compares Riverbank, California to Santa Monica, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Santa Monica (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 92,495 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $79,865 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $1,168,500 |
| White | 79% | 76% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 46% | 16% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 72% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Santa Monica?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Santa Monica: 24047 compared with 92495 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Santa Monica?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Santa Monica?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Santa Monica does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 72% for Santa Monica.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z