Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to San Francisco
This post compares Riverbank, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 79% | 47% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 34% |
| With Kids | 46% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 32% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or San Francisco?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 24047 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z