Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to San Fernando
This post compares Riverbank, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $370,300 |
| White | 79% | 57% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 46% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 32% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or San Fernando?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than San Fernando: 24047 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z