Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to San Bruno
This post compares Riverbank, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $754,700 |
| White | 79% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 32% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or San Bruno?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 24047 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z