Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Riverside
This post compares Riverbank, California to Riverside, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Riverside (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 321,570 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $41,576 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $319,200 |
| White | 79% | 61% |
| Black | 0% | 6% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 46% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 31 |
| Rentals | 32% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Riverside?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Riverside: 24047 compared with 321570 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Riverside?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Riverside?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverside does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 45% for Riverside.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z