Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Redwood City
This post compares Riverbank, California to Redwood City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Redwood City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 84,368 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $70,131 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $1,016,700 |
| White | 79% | 60% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 46% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 32% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Redwood City?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Redwood City: 24047 compared with 84368 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Redwood City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Redwood City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 49% for Redwood City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z